Picchetto d’ onore a Ramallah
Abu Mazen al funerale del terrorista di Monaco ‘ 72
di Francesco Battistini
GERUSALEMME – Il picchetto d’ onore alla Mukata, la passatoia, la corona di fiori dell’ Autorità palestinese, il corteo davanti alla tomba di Arafat, i 21 colpi sparati al cielo. E poi il saluto commosso a «un valoroso combattente della nostra causa», nelle parole del presidente palestinese, Abu Mazen, e dal premier Salam Fayyad, assieme a tutto lo stato maggiore del Fatah. Sono stati funerali solenni quelli di Amin Al-Hindi, 70 anni, morto tre giorni fa in Giordania e sepolto a Gaza: l’ ultimo palestinese del commando di Settembre Nero che pianificò la strage di Monaco alle Olimpiadi del 1972, quando furono massacrati undici atleti israeliani.
È stato Abu Mazen a ordinare una cerimonia di Stato a Ramallah, con toni simili all’ addio già riservato un mese fa a un altro ideatore della strage, Abu Daud, morto a Damasco. «Questi uomini ci mancheranno», ha detto il leader dell’ Anp che era legato da antica amicizia a Hindi, nonostante l’ avesse silurato dopo la morte di Arafat: proprio secondo le rivelazioni di Abu Daud, Abu Mazen partecipò indirettamente all’ attacco del 1972, mentre si trovava in Urss, procurando i soldi necessari all’ azione terroristica.
(Fonte: Corriere della Sera, 20 Agosto 2010, pag. 17)
In alto: la prima pagina del quotidiano israeliano Yediot Aharonot il giorno dopo l’ignobile massacro compiuto dai terroristi palestinesi comandati dal Nobel per la Pace (sic!) Yasser Arafat
#1Daniel
16-05-2005
Abu Mazen: Un crimine la nascita di Israele
La decisione di fondare lo Stato d’Israele nel 1948 (benché prevista da un’apposita risoluzione Onu del 1947) fu un crimine. Lo ha detto il presidente dell’Autorità Palestinese Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) parlando domenica in occasione delle manifestazioni del 57esimo anniversario di quella che i palestinesi chiamano la Nakba (catastrofe), vale a dire appunto la nascita dello Stato di Israele.
“Il nostro popolo non dimenticherà mai e le generazioni a venire non dimenticheranno mai – ha proclamato Abu Mazen in un discorso trasmesso in diretta alla tv palestinese dal Giappone, dove si trova in visita – Quel giorno (il 15 maggio 1948) venne commesso un crimine contro il nostro popolo, la cui esistenza fu distrutta”.
Abu Mazen ha ribadito anche la richiesta di una “soluzione giusta e concordata alla questione dei profughi palestinesi basata sulla risoluzione 194” dell’Assemblea Generale dell’Onu. Il riferimento alla 194 viene normalmente inteso dai palestinesi come il cosiddetto “diritto al ritorno” dei profughi (e di tutti i loro discendenti) all’interno di Israele, anche dopo la nascita di uno stato palestinese.
Migliaia di palestinesi hanno manifestato in occasione della NaKba nelle strade della striscia di Gaza e di Cisgiordania esibendo manifesti e slogan che facevano esplicito riferimento al “diritto al ritorno” (simbolicamente rappresentato dalla “chiavi” delle case perdute) e ad uno stato arabo su “tutta la terra di Palestina”.
Per l’occasione la dirigenza di Hamas ha diffuso una dichiarazione nella quale si definisce Israele un “cancro” e si promette di continuare la lotta armata “fino alla liberazione dell’ultimo centimetro della nostra terra e al ritorno dell’ultimo profugo nella sua casa”.
Nel suo discorso, Abu Mazen ha anche inviato una “benedizione” agli “shahid” (martiri) palestinesi “che hanno irrigato la nostra terra patria con il loro sangue puro”, e a tutti “gli eroici palestinesi che oggi sono dietro le sbarre per aver lottato per l’indipendenza della Palestina”.
“Il fatto stesso che i palestinesi celebrino il 15 maggio, giorno della proclamazione dello Stato di Israele, come il giorno della catastrofe – ha commentato il vice primo ministro israeliano Ehud Olmert – è molto sconfortante, perché indica una mentalità ancora oggi incline a considerare Israele come un ostacolo che deve essere rimosso, anziché una realtà con cui venire a patti e con cui convivere. Si tratta di un fatto assai triste, che gioca contro la pace, per cui speriamo che cambino presto atteggiamento. E prima lo fanno, meglio è”.
Nel sermone pronunciato nella moschea di Gaza il venerdì precedente le celebrazioni della Nakba, lo sceicco Ibrahim Mudairis, ha dichiarato: “Gli ebrei sono un cancro che si diffonde in tutto il mondo… gli ebrei sono responsabili di tutte le guerre e i conflitti. Non chiedete cosa hanno fatto i tedeschi agli ebrei, chiedete che cosa hanno fatto gli ebrei ai tedeschi”. Il sermone è stato trasmesso integralmente dalla tv dell’Autorità Palestinese.
(Da: Jerusalem Post, Ha’aretz, Ynetnews, 15.05.05)
#2Daniel
Abu Mazen è un negatore della Shoah
Quando uno ci scrive la tesi di laurea negando la Shoah…
Inquiry and Analysis Series – No. 95 [ARCHIVES]
May 30, 2002 No.95
http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Area=antisemitism&ID=IA9502
Palestinian Leader: Number of Jewish Victims in the Holocaust
Might be ‘Even Less Than a Million…’ Zionist Movement Collaborated with
Nazis to ‘Expand the Mass Extermination’ of the Jews
A 1982 doctoral dissertation by Secretary-General of the PLO
Executive Committee Mahmoud Abbas, a.k.a. Abu Mazen, who is considered
second to Yasser Arafat, discussed “the secret ties between the Nazis and
the Zionist movement leadership.” Two years later, a study by Abu Mazen
based on his dissertation for Moscow’s Oriental College was published in
Arabic by Dar Ibn Rushd publishers in Amman, Jordan.
In the introduction to his 1984 study, Abu Mazen referred to
well-known Holocaust deniers, raised doubts that gas chambers were used for
extermination of Jews, and claimed that the number of Jews murdered in the
Holocaust might be “even less than a million.” Abu Mazen claimed that the
Zionist movement had a stake in convincing world public opinion that the
number of victims was high; thus, it would achieve “greater gains” after the
war when the time came to “distribute the spoils.”
Abu Mazen’s intention was to undermine the legitimacy of the
Zionist movement by proving that during a critical stage in the history of
the Jewish people – the rise of Nazism and World War II – the Zionist
leadership stopped at nothing to achieve its aim of establishing a Jewish
state. He wrote, “The truth [about the Nazi crimes] has another aspect” that
the West preferred to disregard; instead, the West concealed “a basic
partner in crime” – that is, the Zionist movement. The study pointed to a
convergence of the interests of the Nazi and the Zionist movements, and the
fundamental similarity in the two movements’ theories. The central claim Abu
Mazen sought to prove is that the Zionist movement, with all its factions,
conspired against the Jewish people and collaborated with the Nazis to
annihilate it, because the movement considered “Palestine” the only
appropriate destination for Jewish emigration.
Abu Mazen wrote, “It might be imagined that Zionism would do all
it could, materially and otherwise, to save the Jews, or at least to keep
them [alive] until the end of the war. It might have been expected that it
would arouse world public opinion and direct its attention to the massacres
carried out against the Jews, so that the governments would act to rescue
them from their bitter fate.” But, stated Abu Mazen, “what Zionism did was
the exact opposite of what could have been expected”: The Zionist movement
sabotaged various aid plans[1] and withheld information regarding the bitter
fate of Europe’s Jews “in order to free itself from the need to take
necessary action.” Abu Mazen added, “the Zionist movement led a broad
campaign of incitement against the Jews living under Nazi rule, in order to
arouse the government’s hatred of them, to fuel vengeance against them, and
to expand the mass extermination.”[2]
Introduction: The Truth has Another Aspect
“The Western countries sketched the final picture of the outcome
of World War II. They defined the crimes committed, and described the
criminals and the ones they victimized – after setting themselves up as a
faithful judge with the decisive word in matters of these crimes. They
locked up details, facts, and crimes that they didn’t want to exist; they
ignored names, important people, institutions, organizations, and countries
that they chose to ignore. In the end, they charged the Nazi leaders with
all the crimes that were committed during the war, and they relentlessly
hunted down those still alive, even though the crimes were committed long
ago. The Nuremberg [trials] cut down the tyrants and the murderers, and cast
a [shadow] on the basic partner in the crimes committed during the war.
After they collected [the price] from them – they narrowed the focus on the
crimes, criminals, prosecutors, defendants, and witnesses, and set the
entire matter in limited frameworks that could not be breached. This was how
these countries dealt with half the truth, deliberately neglecting the other
half.”
The Number of Jewish Victims
“During World War II, 40 million people of different nations of
the world were killed. The German people sacrificed 10 million; the Soviet
people 20 million; and the rest [of those killed] were from Yugoslavia,
Poland, and the other peoples. But after the war it was announced that 6
million Jews were among the victims, and that the war of annihilation had
been aimed first of all against the Jews, and only then against the rest of
the peoples of Europe.”
“The truth of the matter is that no one can verify this number,
or completely deny it. In other words, the number of Jewish victims might be
6 million and might be much smaller – even less than 1 million.
[Nevertheless], raising a discussion regarding the number of Jews [murdered]
does not in any way diminish the severity of the crime committed against
them, as murder – even of one man – is a crime that the civilized world
cannot accept and humanity cannot accept.”
“It seems that the Zionist movement’s stake in inflating the
number of murdered in the war was aimed at [ensuring] great gains. This led
it to confirm the number [6 million], to establish it in world opinion, and
by doing so to arouse more pangs of conscience and sympathy for Zionism in
general. Many scholars have debated the question of the 6 million figure,
and reached perplexing conclusions, according to which the Jewish victims
total hundreds of thousands. The well-known Canadian author Roger Delarom[3]
said on this matter: ‘To date, no proof whatsoever exists that the number of
Jewish victims in the Nazi concentration camps reached four million or six
million. Zionism first spoke of 12 million exterminated in these camps, but
then the number decreased greatly, to half, that is, only six million. Then
the number decreased further, and became four million, as the Germans could
not have killed or exterminated more Jews than there were in the world at
that time. In effect, the true number is much smaller than these fictitious
millions.’ The [American] historian and author Raul Hilberg thinks that this
number is no greater than 896,000. “[4]
“The source of the submission of this large number, 6 million
[murdered], is Chaim Weizmann’s 1936 declaration before a British committee
regarding the fate of 6 million Jews living in Europe if a world war should
break out. [According to Weizmann], ‘The little green branches are the ones
that will survive, while the rest must bear their [bitter] fate.’ From that
point on, the Zionist movement insisted that all 6 million were murdered,
and that none of them survived.”
“Afterwards, the Zionist movement attempted to describe how they
[the Jews] were murdered in concentration camps and gas chambers, as it
disregarded two fundamental facts. First, many of the Jews remained alive;
some were rescued by the Zionist movement [which encouraged] their
emigration to Palestine, and some [survived because of] the peoples of the
world that managed to protect them and take them away from the Nazis, as the
Soviet Union did by sending two million Jews to its eastern republics. In
addition, hundreds of thousands of live Jews were found in the concentration
camps when the Allies liberated the territories [conquered by the Nazis].”
“Second, the extermination of the victims was not carried out
only in the concentration camps and gas chambers. Some of the victims fell
as a result of their participation in wars and battles, and also due to
starvation and disease that struck all the peoples of Europe. In addition,
the concentration camps were not only for Jews, but held people from all
over Europe, among them fighters, intellectuals, scholars, prisoners of war,
and opponents of fascism.”
“Regarding the gas chambers, which were supposedly designed for
murdering living Jews: A scientific study published by Professor Robert
Faurisson[5] of France denies that the gas chambers were for murdering
people, and claims that they were only for incinerating bodies, out of
concern for the spread of disease and infection in the region.”[6]
The Zionist Movement Conspired Against the Jewish People
“It takes little effort to prove the truth [about the crimes of
the Nazis] and to document them. World War II did take place, and in it fell
millions of victims. It was Hitler. who established the concentration camps
in all of Europe to hold all of his opponents and enemies, including peoples
not worthy of living, and it was also he who invented the gas chambers.
However, another aspect of the truth remains shrouded in mystery, like the
other side of the moon.”
“How could [anyone with] reason believe that the institutions of
the Zionist movement that arose to defend ‘the [Jewish] people’ then became
a cause of this people’s annihilation? History has taught us that Nero
burned Rome, but he was insane, and his insanity removes from him his
responsibility. History has also taught us that leaders have betrayed their
people and their country and sold them to their enemies. But they are few,
and they alone bear the responsibility for their actions. Therefore, a
popular, public movement’s conspiracy against its ‘people’ is something
astonishing that demands an in-depth and meticulous examination before it is
accused for no reason.”
On the Similarity Between Nazi and Zionist Theory
“When discussing declared Zionist ideas, which have been
espoused with profound conviction and faith by the movement’s followers, one
finds that they believe in the purity of the Jewish race – as Hitler
believed in the purity of the Aryan race – and the movement calls for
finding a deeply-rooted and decisive solution to the ‘Jewish problem’ in
Europe via immigration to Palestine. Hitler also called for this, and
carried it out. The Zionist movement maintains that antisemitism is an
eternal problem that throbs in the Gentiles’ blood; that it is not possible
to put an end to it or get away from it; and thus it is the basic motive for
Zionist immigration. It follows that if antisemitism did not exist it would
be necessary to invent it, and that if its flame dies away it must be
fanned. David Ben-Gurion defined the Zionist movement as immigration [to
Israel] and nothing else; whoever does not immigrate [to Israel] denies the
Torah and the Talmud and therefore is not a Jew. These ideas provide a
general dispensation to every racist in the world, most prominently Hitler
and the Nazis, to treat the Jews as they wish, as long as this includes
immigration to Palestine.”
The Entire Zionist Movement is Responsible for Conspiring with
the Nazis
“In order to avoid error and generalization regarding the
various factions of the Zionists, and for the purpose of accuracy, we must
point out that the Zionist movement was divided. One part held the
leadership and another part formed the opposition. Can we accuse the second
group, which was not party to the institutions and leadership [of conspiring
against the Jewish people]? This question is relevant in only one incident –
whether there were differences of opinion between the two sides regarding
the origin of the Zionist theory and regarding the practical implementation
of Zionist thought. But if the point of departure and the implementation
went together, as indeed happened – then there is no room for question. An
Arabic proverb states, ‘When differences of opinion arise among thieves, the
theft is revealed.’ This is what happened with the Zionist movement; when
the Labor Party ruled Israel, it refused the Revisionists [the future Likud
party] their share, and so [the Revisionists] began to expose the facts and
rend the curtain of falsehood. However, in the heat of argument over the
roles of the Laborites [in conspiring with the Nazis], they forgot to speak
of the role they played, which was no different from that of others. Then
came a third side and revealed the positions of all.”
——————————————————————–
[1] In the study, Abu Mazen notes several incidents in which the
Zionist movement ignored the fate of the Jews and actively undermined plans
to aid them. He wrote, “In 1943, there was an opportunity to send packages
of food, medicine, and clothing to Jews in the ghettos of Europe. The
International Red Cross, in cooperation with the U.S. government, began
collecting these packages, but the Zionist movement objected to the proposal
and sabotaged the idea, claiming that the German Red Cross would be the
recipient [of the packages]. Because of these positions, thousands died in
the ghetto of epidemic and starvation, even before the Nazis began their
actions. Infant mortality ranged from 60% to 70% in various places – nothing
could be more terrible. Had intentions been good, there were ways and means
of delivering the packages, via the Red Cross or some neutral country such
as Switzerland, Turkey, or Portugal, and they would have been sent – and all
these children could have been saved.”
[2] Abu Mazen stated in his paper, “The Zionist movement’s most
obvious incitement activities against the Jews living under the German
conquest were the decisions of the Biltmore Conference, held in the U.S. [in
May, 1942]. when the Zionist leaders declared war on Germany on behalf of
the Jewish people. When Hitler learned about the conclusions of the
conference through his ambassador in the U.S., he was enraged, and declared,
‘Now I will liquidate them.’ Afterwards he held an urgent meeting with all
Germany’s leaders, and they developed their detailed plans for the Final
Solution. We must not overestimate the importance of the Biltmore Conference
and see it as the only reason leading Hitler to authorize the Final
Solution, but it is clear that the decisions taken at the conference were
one of Hitler’s main excuses for speeding up the implementation of his
solution regarding the Jews, and therefore this conference can be seen as
one of the more important causes that led to the [bitter] end.”
[3] The spelling of this name is not certain; the name as it
appears in the study is unknown.
[4] Abu Mazen cited p. 670 of Hilberg’s The Destruction of the
European Jews as the source of this data. However, an examination of this
source shows that no such figure is mentioned. Hilberg writes that between
1935 and 1945 world Jewry lost a third of its number; it dropped from 16
million to about 11 million. It should be noted that the original Russian
version of Abu Mazen’s study focuses much less on how many Jews were
murdered than does the Arabic version, and includes only the figure of
896,000, which Abu Mazen attributes to Hilberg.
[5] A well-known Holocaust denier.
[6] In the original version of this study (in Russian) the
question of whether or not gas chambers were used to murder Jews does not
appear.
MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may ONLY be
cited with proper attribution.
—
#3Daniel
12-10-2006
Abu Mazen: “Non è necessario riconoscere Israele”
Subito dopo aver dichiarato, durante un incontro la settimana scorsa con il segretario di stato Usa Condoleezza Rice, che avrebbe chiesto a Hamas di riconoscere il diritto ad esistere dello stato di Israele, il presidente dell’Autorità Palestinese Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) ha detto, riesponendo alle domande della tv araba al-Arabiya, che né Hamas né la sua stessa fazione Fatah sono obbligati a riconoscere lo stato ebraico. “Hamas non è obbligata a riconoscere Israele – ha detto Abu Mazen – Non è necessario che lo faccia Hamas, né che lo faccia Fatah, né il Fronte Popolare.
Le contraddittorie dichiarazioni, in arabo e in inglese, del presidente palestinese sono state sottolineate dal centro di monitoraggio Palestinian Media Watch.
Incontrando Condoleezza Rice, Abu Mazen aveva garantito che avrebbe richiesto il riconoscimento di Israele d a parte di Hamas come pre-condizione per creare un governo di unità nazionale. La Rice, dal canto suo, aveva dichiarato ai giornalisti in una conferenza stampa insieme ad Abu Mazen che gli Stati Uniti avrebbero trovato il modo di aiutare il presidente palestinese, esprimendo anche “grande ammirazione” per la sua leadership e per ciò che ella definiva la sua “volontà” di riavviare i negoziati israelo-palestinesi.
Tuttavia, poco dopo, parlando in arabo alla tv al-Arabiya, lo stesso Abu Mazen spiegava che nemmeno Fatah ha mai ufficialmente riconosciuto Israele. “L’Olp [organizzazione ombrello di varie fazioni palestinesi] ha riconosciuto Israele nel 1993 quando Israele riconobbe l’Olp – ha spiegato Abu Mazen – Ma ognuno ha il diritto di dire: io non lo riconosco. È chiaro? È un diritto di chiunque e di qualunque organizzazione”.
È vero che diversi leader di Fatah, compreso lo stesso Abu Mazen, hanno affermato molte volte di riconoscere lo stato ebraico. Ma Abu Mazen ha spiegato ai telespettatori di al-Arabiya che tali dichiarazioni di riconoscimento erano necessarie per fare fronte alle esigenze “quotidiane” degli affari palestinesi e che il riconoscimento da parte sua riguardava soltanto gli interlocutori politici israeliani, non lo stato di Israele in quanto tale. “Il futuro governo [palestinese] – ha detto Abu Mazen – avrà a che fare ogni giorno con gli israeliani e ogni ora, forse ogni minuto, vi saranno contatti fra ministri palestinesi e ministri israeliani. Dunque vi chiedo: come potrebbero, questo governo o i suoi ministri, non riconoscere i loro interlocutori e risolvere i problemi del popolo?”
A titolo di esempio della necessità di riconoscere i singoli interlocutori politici israeliani, Abu Mazen ha fatto riferimento ai 500 milioni di dollari di prelievo fiscale destinati all’Autorità Palestinese ma congelati da Israele dopo l’elezione di Hamas. “Il ministro delle finanze palestinese deve arrivare a un accordo con il ministro delle finanz e israeliano sul trasferimento di questi soldi. Dunque, come può fare un accordo se non lo riconosce?”
(Da: YnetNews, 11.10.06)
#4Ruben Dr
………………Nella sua autobiografia intitolata “Memorie di un terrorista palestinese” (pubblicata nel 1999 in Francia), Daoud (oggi settantenne) afferma che i fondi per l’ operazione vennero raccolti da Mahmoud Abbas (meglio noto quale Abu Mazen, succeduto ad Arafat alla guida dell’ Autorita’ Palestinese dal 15 gennaio 2005), all’ oscuro dello scopo per il quale essi sarebbero serviti. Yasser Arafat (futuro Premio Nobel per la Pace) supporto’ invece senza scrupoli di sorta l’ intera operazione.
#5barbara
Ah ecco, vedo che quello che volevo scrivere io lo ha già scritto Ruben (beh, dai, è confortante constatare che siamo almeno in due a saperlo!) (ma tu ci credi che lui non sapeva a che cosa dovevano servire?) Quindi non dovrebbe sorprendere più di tanto che chi ha fatto l’angelo custode dell’inizio della nobile impresa, lo faccia anche all’ultimo atto, no?
#6Jon
Notizie su cui è bene riflettere…per il bene di Israele e del mondo in generale.
#7Jon
…e per ribadire il diritto d’esistere d’Israele e la lotta ad ogni forma di antisemitismo.
#8Oloscettico
Settembre Nero (270bis)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ci2ifAMC2PI&feature=search
la dedico a tutti voi piccoli ebreucci fanatici… ormai le vostre balle non ci fanno più paura, Intifada fino alla vittoria!
FUORI LA COLONIA SIONISTA DALLA PALESTINA
Il mondo ci ha tacciato
di briganti e di assassini, uccisori
di donne e di bambini
ma nessuno vuol vedere
i corpi straziati dei nostri figli
sotto i carri armati
i campi devastati
dal fuoco americano
i nostri corpi
dalle iene di sharon
Ma tra le dune sorge
il mitra di Settembre Nero
Sulla Palestina ora rivive
lo spirito guerriero
Troppo ci pesava
il bastone da pastore
i nostri figli preferiscono il fucile
l’odio che han sorbito
con il latte delle madri
ora esplode negli aerei della EL AL
troppo ci pesava
portare sulla schiena
il dominio di una razza di mercanti
se con l’oro hanno comprato
la mia casa e la mia terra
la mia libertà si paga con il sangue!
E tra le dune sorge
il mitra di Settembre Nero
Sulla Palestina ora
rivive lo spirito guerriero
Gridano “Shalom”
bruciandoci le case
cantano pace e ci violentano le donne
Aiuta chi è più ricco
baionette ai moribondi
queste sono le leggi di Mosé
ma a noi indicò Maometto
la strada da seguire
il nostro Allah si onora col tritolo
a chi predica la pace
massacrando la tua gente
dal Corano il nostro Dio
risponde guerra!
E tra le dune sorge
il mitra di Settembre Nero
Sulla Palestina ora
rivive lo spirito guerriero
#9Emanuel Baroz
bella poesia!…..bah!
#10Daniele Coppin
x Oloscettico
lirica degna di quelle di epoca fascista, d’altra parte tra intolleranti e violenti ci si intende, come dimostrarono i buoni rapporti di amicizia tra Mussolini e il Gran Muftì di Gerusalemme. E sono fatti storici dimostrati, non balle come quelle dei nazistelli rossi filopalestinesi come te.
#11Ted
Ma non erqno stati TUTTI eliminati dal Mossad nel corso degli anni seguenti questi fetenti macellai palestinisti? Oppure ho sognato? Grave errore aver mancato tale appuntamento… hanno lasciato dei degni eredi in Siria… Puah!!!